Flannel is not information
One of the topics mentioned in the discussion with Mr Higgins — but with no real information forthcoming — was the proposed HS2 hub at Crewe, recommended in the ‘HS2 Plus’ report. Mr Higgins admitted that he did not know what the hub’s cost would be. But if he does not know its cost, how could he recommend that it should be built?
Also unclear was what the purpose of the hub would be. Mr Higgins has suggested that capacity supposedly “freed” by not running trains from HS1 onto HS2 could be instead used to provide HS2 services to North Wales. However, such services would not require construction of the Crewe hub.
In 1985 the lines around Crewe were extensively remodelled, and capacity taken out. Undoing the capacity reduction, and creation of Crewe Hub, would be a project of similar scale to the remodelling of Reading station.
The Beleben estimate is that the Crewe hub proposal would add at least £1 billion to the cost of HS2, which would cause presentational difficulties. There may be attempts to ‘externalise’ the costs of HS2-related expenditure by reallocating items like Crewe Hub to Network Rail or other budgets.
[…] it was hard to see the point of what was saying. Deightons evidence has been charitably termed as ‘waffle and flannel’ by one commentator, after he said he wanted to win ‘hearts and minds’ by ‘growing cake’, but could not offer […]
STOP HS2 | TSC hear from two chairs, but would have done better booking a sofa.
March 26, 2014 at 1:21 pm