HS2 and decreased capacity
According to Network Rail, HS2 ‘releases capacity’ for ‘faster, more frequent trains’ on the West Coast Main Line.
However, the available evidence suggests that HS2 is more about ‘decreased capacity’ than ‘released capacity’.
On the busiest section of the West Coast Main Line – the London approach – the number of tracks would be permanently reduced from six to five, so at any one time, inbound and outbound capacity would not be equal.
This problem would be compounded by the number of classic platforms at Euston reducing from 18 to 13.
At St Pancras, hundreds of millions of pounds were spent on a cack-handed redesign of the station, which left the Midland Main Line with just four platforms. Despite growing commuter demand from the east of London, half the capacity of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link (HS1) goes unused, because it, and New St Pancras, was not designed to take trains from Essex.
Is Theresa May’s government really going to proceed with an even bigger botch?
With reference to the graphic for platform closures ate Euston, I think you will find that platforms 16, 17 & 18 are closed several years earlier than 2026, this being the target date for the opening of Phase 1. I would suggest 2019 / 20 be closer to the truth.
starwbrick
November 22, 2017 at 1:34 pm
So how is Adding more tracks decreased capacity total number is 23 in 2033 and 18 Now. 23-18 = 5 EXTRA tracks
Palmer
November 23, 2017 at 5:15 pm
It’s CLASSIC lines reduced…
18 now 13 predicted future…
Fiona Banks
November 24, 2017 at 8:24 pm
[…] https://beleben.wordpress.com/2017/11/22/hs2-and-decreased-capacity/ […]
Useful links » Mid Cheshire Against HS2
November 26, 2017 at 9:54 pm