beleben

die belebende Bedenkung

HS2 versus do-minimum

leave a comment »

At Birmingham’s New Street station on 2 October, transport ministers Chris Grayling and Andrew Jones were happy to pose at a concourse exhibit for the High Speed Rail Industry Leaders Group.

Transport minister Andrew Jones MP at Birmingham New Street station  for the Conservative party conference, 2 Oct 2016, 2 Oct 2016 ('HSRILG') hsrilg-twitter-chris-grayling-02oct2016

Mr Grayling has said that HS2 is as much about capacity as it is about speed, and would help ease congestion on overcrowded trains.

However, the available data suggests that

  • capacity pressures are strongest on the commuter lines east and south of London
  • the InterCity West Coast service group is ‘unique, because it has a considerable amount of unused capacity’
  • building HS2 would result in the creation of large amounts of capacity, for which there is no market
  • HS2 would have very little effect on total overcrowding
  • foreseeable demand on the West Coast Main Line could be comfortably accommodated without building HS2.

In October 2013, to please the government, Network Rail announced that alternatives to building HS2 which would instead upgrade existing lines ‘could need 14 years of weekend closures’, but refused to release any details to support their claim.

So how many ‘years of weekend closures’ would really be needed, to accommodate forecast growth on the West Coast Main Line?

Advertisements

Written by beleben

October 3, 2016 at 8:52 am

Posted in High speed rail, HS2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: