die belebende Bedenkung

A major call for evidence

with one comment

Outdated and uncompetitive rail transport in the North: Kirkby station, Merseyside, by Raymond Knapman (Creative Commons)

Before next year’s Budget, Britain’s independent National Infrastructure Commission will publish on “three national challenges”:

[National Infrastructure Commission call for evidence,, 13 Nov 2015]

* Improving connectivity between cities in the north of England

* Large-scale transport infrastructure improvements in London

* Improving how electricity demand and supply are balanced.

[…] For each of these studies, we will engage with the relevant government departments, regulators and delivery organisations, including Network Rail, TfL and the National Grid as we develop our thinking. We are also keen to gather evidence and ideas from local government, businesses, service providers, users and others to support and shape this work.

Hence this call for evidence, which sets out the key questions for each of the three reports.

We look forward to receiving submissions, and thank you in advance for your engagement.
The Call for Evidence will allow the National Infrastructure Commission’s work on these studies to draw upon a wide evidence base and spectrum of options.

One of the problems with the idea of a national infrastructure commission is its likely propensity to look for infrastructure-based ‘solutions’ to problems which might be better addressed in another way.

Another question is how ‘independent’ the Commission’s decision-making would be.

[Current members of The National Infrastructure Commission]

Andrew Adonis (interim ‘chair’)
Sir John Armitt
Professor Tim Besley
Demis Hassabis
Lord Heseltine
Sadie Morgan
Bridget Rosewell
Sir Paul Ruddock

Improving connectivity between cities in the north of England would, no doubt, require significant investment in infrastructure. To plan such works effectively, one would need access to a great deal of up-to-date quantitative data. But open data on transport demand and suchlike is severely deficient (for example, because of rail and bus privatisation).

All in all, the prognosis is not too good. It seems likely that much of the ‘evidence’ submitted to the NIC will just be the usual special-interest and wonk-tank fare.

Written by beleben

November 20, 2015 at 10:47 am

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Network Rail’s train planning department, in the past, intervened to block any improvement to the urban local train services in the West Midlands.


    November 20, 2015 at 9:41 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: