die belebende Bedenkung

In defence of folly

leave a comment »

David HigginsOn 15 May 2015 Financial Times columnist Jeremy Paxman described the HS2 project as “a grotesque waste of taxpayers’ money” (paywall). HS2 Ltd’s chairman David Higgins defended the project in a response published on the website.

[15 May 2015]

Dear Sir

Jeremy Paxman, in his familiar style, dismisses HS2 as a folly. Perhaps he would like to consider a few facts. Rail travel in this country has doubled in the past twenty years and is forecast to keep growing at five percent minimum per year. The result is a rail network that is so full that incremental improvements, whilst very welcome, will not deliver the step change in capacity that is needed. He might also want to consider why productivity in countries such as France, Germany and the Netherlands, which have invested in high speed rail, is higher than in this country. HS2 will help relieve the housing, commercial property and transport pressure on London whilst improving connectivity, and therefore productivity, in the Midlands and the North. That is why HSBC is moving its UK headquarters to Birmingham by 2018 and why, elected, local authority leaders across the Midlands and the North, as well as an overwhelming majority of MPs support the scheme. Passengers who queue on a daily basis at Paddington and London Bridge, or those who have to stand on the West Coast Mainline are paying the price of dithering and delay by previous generations. Imagine what it will be like in twenty years’ time if we fail once again to seize the chance for change.

Yours faithfully

Sir David Higgins
Chair, HS2 Ltd

While it is more or less true to say that GB passenger journeys have doubled to 1,500 million since 1994, high speed rail has not been a facilitator of that uplift. HS1 carried only 12 million domestic and 9.9 million international passengers in 2012. So national rail growth arose — and was accommodated on — existing lines, with no increase in passengers in “excess of capacity”.

Passengers in excess of capacity on GB rail did not increase with total ridership

Whether or not long distance rail travel to Manchester, Sheffield, and Leeds “is forecast to keep growing at five percent minimum”, is not a reason to spend £50+ billion on high speed rail. The volume of such traffic is very small, and would remain small, even with five percent year-on-year growth.

Diagrams of GB passenger rail volumes from a Financial Times article, Feb 2015

According to the McNulty report, annual rail journeys could increase by another ~100% in the period to 2030. But the HS2 project is not relevant to accommodating such growth.

Graph of passenger rail journeys in Great Britain, showing contribution of West Coast long distance traffic

Written by beleben

June 2, 2015 at 9:49 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: