beleben

die belebende Bedenkung

HS2 and Merseyside

with 4 comments

Rather than provide a specific information sheet for Merseyside, HS2 Ltd has given the county second billing in a combined ‘Cheshire & Merseyside‘ document. Curious, because Merseyside is larger in population, and a bigger market for the railway.

HS2 Ltd, Cheshire & Merseyside infosheet header, 2013

The map in the infosheet focuses on Crewe, rather than Liverpool.

HS2 Ltd Cheshire infosheet, Crewe map, 2013

As with the Leeds, Toton, and Meadowhall infosheets, there is some problematic content.

HS2 Ltd, Cheshire infosheet 2013, 'two trains from Liverpool to London in 1 hr 36 mn'

Journey times* From Liverpool
Destination Current time (mins) HS2 time (mins)
London 128 96
Birmingham 122 70
*Serving regional stations
Journeys to Liverpool from London and the wider Birmingham areas through Birmingham Interchange are expected to be reduced by 32 and 52 minutes respectively when HS2 is up and running.

Crewe and Warrington are expected to experience similar time savings to the faster Liverpool services (around 30 mins). Other regional stations such as Stafford and Runcorn would still see savings, though they will be slightly different as the trains would leave the HS2 line at Lichfield and not Crewe.

The infosheet puts HS2 forward as a ‘crucial capacity lifeline’ for North West England, but the project does not involve any new track being built into Merseyside (so there would be no released capacity benefit for its local services).

And on the Scotland route, the HS2 track would only extend as far north as Wigan, so there would be no capacity uplift for the West Coast Main Line (WCML) in Lancashire and Cumbria. (Fortunately, passenger demand north of Weaver Junction is quite low.)

According to Adam Joyce (@randomravings, apparently a press officer for HS2 Ltd), “The HS2 trains able to run on the existing network will be 265m long, so as long as the extended 11-car Pendolinos…The 200m long rationale is based on Scottish services which would separate at Carstairs. One to Edinburgh, one to Glasgow.”

Merseyside journey details given in HS2 Ltd’s infosheet are not consistent with the company’s January 2013 service pattern concept. The latter shows only one of the twice-hourly Liverpool trains running from London in 1 hour 36 minutes. The other one, routed via Stafford, would take longer.

Furthermore, Mr Joyce’s claim that classic compatible trains “would be 265 metres long” is difficult to reconcile with details provided by HS2 Ltd. Its January 2012 Review of the Technical Specification for High Speed Rail in the UK stated “At this stage, we have only assumed the use of 260m sets for phase two operations to Newcastle services”. And in its January 2013 service pattern concept, one Liverpool classic compatible train is shown as running in combination with a Birmingham Curzon Street service.

HS2 Ltd, Y network Jan 2013 service pattern concept

How could a 265-metre long classic compatible trainset destined for Liverpool, be coupled to a 200-metre trainset bound for Birmingham? The combination would surely be too long for the HS2 platforms at Euston and Bickenhill.

Advertisements

Written by beleben

February 13, 2013 at 10:45 am

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Good article – worrying for Merseyside to see Liverpool relegated by HS2 not just below Manchester, which makes a stronger economic case, but Cheshire too. This should be a wake up call for Liverpool’s lobby, which must not allow the round trip to London to fall an hour behind our friends across Chat Moss.

    Readers may be interested in this forthcoming TCPA article comparing rail and regeneration planning in Britain and France – France takes a more integrated, ‘territorial’ approach, using rail investment to shape and stimulate urban development in a highly strategic way: http://goo.gl/VJHcJ

    Share The City

    February 13, 2013 at 12:45 pm

  2. […] could not be longer than around 400 metres. But Adam Joyce, apparently a press officer for HS2 Ltd, tweeted that classic compatible trains would be 260 metres long. If that were the case, it’s hard to […]

  3. […] Beleben’s detailed rail blog has worrying details of Merseyside’s downgrading in HS2 thinking  […]

  4. […] Beleben’s detailed rail blog has details of Merseyside’s downgrading in HS2 thinking  […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: