beleben

die belebende Bedenkung

‘The faster, the better’

with one comment

The key issue for Britain’s HS2 high speed rail project is the speed at which trains run. So said Lord Adonis, then UK Secretary of State for Transport, in 2009 (reported Damien Henderson in Scotland’s Herald Newspaper, on 30 December 2009).

Story: Extra stations will damage high-speed rail network
30 December 2009

One of the key architects of the UK’s new high-speed rail network has warned that ministers must limit the number of cities included and face down powerful local lobby groups or risk building an ineffective “medium-speed” railway.

Sir David Rowlands, chair of High Speed Two (HS2), the Government-commissioned company drawing up plans for the multi-billion pound network, signalled a tough political battle ahead in deciding which cities would be included in the route.
[…]
But he warned there were powerful interest groups forming which could potentially derail its potential. “There are a lot of local interest groups who want to be included in a high-speed network. If we’re not careful we could end up with a medium-speed network which doesn’t fulfil what it’s set out to do,” he told The Herald.
[…]
But arguments about capping the number of stops en route to Scotland are likely to dominate the forthcoming decade. While journey times between Glasgow and Edinburgh to London could be cut to less than three hours, any additional stops would add 10 minutes on to the journey time, Sir David warned.

Sources at HS2 said there was a mismatch between the number of cities pushing for inclusion and those that had a high enough population density to justify a stop. Carlisle, in particular, has seen a vocal campaign but is at the centre of one of the most sparsely populated areas.
[…]
Iain Coucher, chief executive of Network Rail, has sought to dampen expectations of how many cities could be included. “Our experiences and the experience around the world is that you should put at least 100 miles between stations,” he told New Civil Engineer earlier this year.

The formula developed by Network Rail, which has conducted its own 12-month study into high-speed rail options, would raise questions about a route which included Manchester, Preston and Carlisle along the west coast, or Sheffield, Leeds and Newcastle on an east coast route.

In Germany, local authorities have used their planning powers to force stations to be built along high-speed lines. Unlike France’s network, which runs only high-speed passenger trains, Germany allows slow trains and freight trains to use the network.
[…]
Another option is to build a spur connecting the main line to a city station so that some trains can pass by on a limited stop service. But those drawing up detailed plans for the network are understood to be against including too many spurs as this would reduce the number of trains operating per hour and damage the attractiveness of the service.

Lord Adonis, the UK Secretary of State for Transport, said earlier this year: “Clearly there are political and other factors to take into account. The key issue is the speed at which trains run.

Advertisements

Written by beleben

January 4, 2013 at 11:25 am

Posted in HS2, Politics, Scotland

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] Rail — the answer is (c). In 2009, Iain Coucher, then chief executive of the company, was reported as saying that, “experience around the world is that you should put at least 100 miles [~160 km] […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: