Sim-ply misinformation
Alan Marshall’s buddy Sim Harris has offered his tuppenceworth on the topic of West Coast rail capacity, on the Railnews blog.
THOSE opposed to the building of a High Speed line between London, the West Midlands and north of England — with a potential extension onwards to Scotland — are apparently becoming desperate.
Distortions and exaggerations have become commonplace, but now we are moving towards the zone of serious, blatant misinformation.
A good example of one outburst which comes perilously near to this zone has been published by the BBC, in the form of a short video presented as a ‘Soap box’ item by the celebrated actor Geoffrey Palmer.
As a talented actor of long experience Mr Palmer is rightly praised, but in a presentation which is little short of disgraceful — topped and tailed with heart-rending snatches of Vaughan Williams — he has stooped to trot out the now tired rhetoric about whether the West Coast Main Line needs to be supported by a new route.
David Higgins, the chief executive of Network Rail, says it does, and indeed has warned that the challenge will be getting the West Coast to shoulder the burden until 2026, when the London–Birmingham High Speed section is due to open. It is already ‘trashed’, he has warned. Passenger figures are rising — there are almost no spare paths left now — never mind by 2026.
But Higgins must have got it wrong, according to the outstandingly foolish, selfish but well-heeled denizens of the Chilterns (most of whom would not be there had it not been for the railways built by previous generations).
Mr Palmer can barely hide his glee as he tells his audience that the claims of little spare capacity left on the WCML cannot be right, because figures recently released show that ‘long-distance’ trains leaving Euston in the evening rush hour are only about half full. So where’s the problem?
The problem, of course, is that Mr Palmer is either deliberately or inadvertently failing to take into account the fact that Virgin trains leaving London during the evening peak are not fully loaded because the fares are high at that time. Indeed, the level of the fares is discouraging demand. When peak restrictions end, the following trains are packed.
Peak hours are really about commuter services, and London Midland trains running from London Euston between 16.30 and 19.00 as far as Northampton and Birmingham are loaded to capacities well over 90 per cent. And there are no more paths, or virtually none. A further 10 per cent rise in demand will mean that the suburban services will, on average, all be overloaded — with no capacity left on board. Certainly no seats. And this could happen by 2015, or even next year.
By ignoring the suburban and regional services and choosing to quote the selective passenger figures about Virgin alone, a highly dubious picture is painted.
Let me be quite clear. Mr Palmer is not lying. Nothing he says about the statistics is actually untrue, but the oath taken by witnesses in court requires them to tell ‘the whole truth’ for a very good reason.
Mr Palmer has not told the whole truth, and the effect is profoundly misleading.
He — and those who have encouraged him to do this — should be ashamed.
I don’t think Mr Harris should be lecturing people on misinformation and truth-telling in the closing sentences of a load of old nonsense like that. Peak hour fares on West Coast aren’t that much different to those on other railways out of London. So it’s little wonder that the Department for Transport’s high speed rail zealots fought to keep secret the fact that half the seats on Euston ICWC peak services are empty. And however high fares are, they’re evidently not high enough to cover the costs of the West Coast operation. Without subsidies like the Network Grant, neither the Virgin Trains or London Midland services would run.
The capacity of London Midland peak trains has nothing to do with HS2, and everything to do with path utilisation. LM is inefficiently run — as shown by the recent driver shortage debacle — and has insufficient (and inappropriate) rolling stock to make use of available paths.
Before becoming chief executive of Network Rail, David Higgins appears to have taken little interest in Britain’s railway industry. His belief that the West Coast Line is being ‘trashed’ compared with previous eras, is poppycock. The line took a heavier pounding four decades ago, when badly sprung Class 86 locomotives hauled the trains.
Just want to support the argument under-utilisation of the existing railway. One of the reasons jams are jammed when they are is because their arent enough carriages because to run additional carriages cost the operator money – they would always prefer to run overcrowded trains for their best customers at peak times than invest in comfort.
Jason Frost
January 10, 2013 at 12:54 pm
There is no denying that London Midland trains are crowded at peak times as are many other commuter services into and out of London. According to data from the DfT there were more standing passengers on trains to/from Waterloo, Liverpool Street and Paddington than Euston during peak hours in 2011. However Project 110 which is due to be fully implemented by May 2014 will provide greater capacity at peak times as well as faster (110 mph) trains for London Midland rail travellers. The additional trains will provide 10% more capacity from Northampton to London at morning peaks and 20% more capacity for the evening peaks.
Northampton is a busy station with 2.5 million passengers in the last year. Currently there are 54 trains each way between Northampton and Euston per day. The ”Demand and Appraisal Report HS2 London – West Midlands” published in April 2012 (and available from the HS2 Ltd website) outlines the anticipated schedule for classic trains on the WCML after the introduction of HS2. Rather than providing additional trains for Northampton, this schedule indicates that there will be only 42 trains each way between Northampton and Euston per day. So this will be a reduction of 12 trains per day in each direction post HS2 compared to today and an even greater reduction compared to the Project 110 schedule.
Some will say the Demand and Appraisal Report only provides an indicative schedule. In which case why did HS2 Ltd bother to publish it and why was it updated only 9 months after the previous version was published?
I communicated with the councillor responsible for transport at Northamptonshire County Council on the subject of Northampton’s train services post HS2. His response contained the following views:
“I am well aware that the service level for Northampton contained in the published proposals for HS2 falls short of both the reasonable aspirations of the town and the importance which ministers have attached to serving the area post-HS2. This is something of which all county councillors have been made aware in the reports we have considered on the subject. I have made this point myself to ministers on several occasions, and along with my officers have repeatedly made the point to officials from both the Department for Transport and HS2 Limited. While they have acknowledged that their published proposals are not really fit for purpose, I have been disappointed that no better proposals have been forthcoming”.
There are other stations on this route which will experience a less frequent commuter service post HS2 compared to today. These reductions in train services include:
• Hemel Hempstead 15%
• Berkhamsted 14%
The bad news does not stop there. I can currently list another ten stations each handling one million or more passengers per year which will have a reduction in services post HS2. Since the Demand and Appraisal Report was last published, the DfT has revised the HS2 business case. In doing so, it has increased the “efficiency improvements” (service cuts) from £5.1 billion to £7.7 billion i.e. by approximately 50%. So there will be even more cuts to services on classic rail than those already listed. This does not tie in well with DfT claims about freeing up capacity on classic rail which could enable extra trains to be run.
Would Mr Harris be happier if Geoffrey Palmer had included the above information as well?
Andrew Bodman
January 10, 2013 at 3:10 pm
To quote London Midland, the Project 110 improvements are made possible by a “combination of improved availability of the Class 350 fleet from December 2012 and the delivery of additional EMU trains in Spring 2014″.
So Mr Harris might also like to answer the question: Had London Midland chosen to improve train availability,and order more trains, a few years ago, how many people would be standing in 2013?
beleben
January 10, 2013 at 4:50 pm
I endeavoured to post the same comment as I made above on the Railnews website under the relevant Sim Harris blog. It is still awaiting moderation 24 hours later. Was it too lengthy or maybe too uncomfortable for Mr Harris?
Andrew Bodman
January 11, 2013 at 4:14 pm
The moderator at Railnews has now approved my comment along with 7 other comments. Some other people also suggest that HS2 is not necessarily the solution to the problems on the WCML.
Andrew Bodman
January 15, 2013 at 11:51 am